


Moderators: Bullseye, Moderators
My 0th Anny .357/.38 is like that, they show you where to put a hole in the grip to use the lock, I have locks on a lot of guns but have never used them. Guy at the club one dy after we walk about 250 yard out into the woodto the sporting clays course, discovers he does not have the key, must never have been a Boy Scout.greener wrote:The new Blackhawks have a lock under the left grip panel. You have to remove the grips to lock the revolver. At least you can't see the lock.
Hey there Mr BG, can you wait util I unlock my gun so I can blow your butt away?greener wrote:I have a key for the 442 on my key chain, just in case. I'm sure the BG will wait for me to unlock the revolver. I haven't tried it on my other lockable handguns. I never use the locks. No young children in the house and Maw and I can remember to keep fingers off triggers until it's shooting time.
I think ruger22 said that for him SA revolvers were more accurate. I think you can generally get better precision and accuracy with a DA/SA revolver in SA. The trigger is usually lighter, crisper and has a much shorter travel. Most of the folks I see shooting DA's shoot them in SA. I decided some time ago that the only way I was going to get proficient shooting DA was to shoot that exclusively. I've fired my GP100 DA so much that I have to remind myself that I can shoot it SA. I'm close to the same accuracy and precision with DA as I get SA, but it has taken a while.Hi Ball wrote:RUGER-22.......Sir, please prove to me that "single action" revolvers are more accurate than Double Action!!! I am all hears OK.![]()
![]()
Yes, I did say that for me they are. It seems the grip just holds steadier in my hand, compared to pistols. I don't have a DA revolver right now, but in years back DAs (fired in SA mode) came in second to SAs, and autos were third so far as how small my groups were.Hi Ball wrote:RUGER-22.......Sir, please prove to me that "single action" revolvers are more accurate than Double Action!!! I am all hears OK.![]()
![]()
The S&W will have that ugly lock in the sideplate. That's enough to make me move on.
The decisiion was made a while ago, and it was the S&W 357. I have been very happy with it, it shoots great. I like target shooting with light loads so I don't get bothered by recoil. It is such a beefy gun that it doesn't really matter anyway.I have all kind of Blackhawks and Vaqs that I love but also have a great 686 S&W so it depends on how you intend to use it.
Be my guest. You can even file the serial numbers off and put your own on it.FourCornerm'n wrote:Thanks, Greener. WYP (with your permission) I hope to honor you and your mentor by discovering times to repeat that insight to students or friends? Certainly take it with me, for my use, next time out.
FourCornerm'n
Now you're looking in the right place friend. When I have problems, the cause of them is usually found there also.greener wrote:
A very high percentage of the times my guns have accuracy problems all I need to find the cause is a mirror.
Good to hear from you again Hermit, it has beeb a while , eh?arizona-hermit wrote:There really is no choice for me... Ruger all the way.
Why? I have owned over a hundred Ruger weapons over the past 5 decades and never had a problem with ANY of them.
I have owned three S&W revolvers and two pistols in the same five decades and had problems with each and every one of them. The absolute worst revolver I ever owned was a S&W model 29 in 44 magnum. After less than 1,000 rounds down the tube, the rifling was completely gone (no joke). The tube looked just like a shotgun barrel. Took me nearly a year to get the Rod and Gun (Germany) folks to get it replaced by S&W. The week the replacement arrived, I traded it off for a very nice Ruger side by side 12.
Just my .02
I have been so 'busy' with things (you know - "Do this do that... no I meant to say do this...") that my forum browsing has suffered.bearandoldman wrote: Good to hear from you again Hermit, it has beeb a while , eh?