Page 1 of 1
Follow-up on the Taurus Judge
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:43 pm
by gcp
Please understand guys, I intend no ill will against this gun because for what it was designed it can sure enough serve its purpose. I am just a stickler for accuracy and this gun can not provide it. I was hoping it would prove more accurate but deep inside I knew better all along. After all a wise man must never argue with nature and physics
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:44 pm
by jjfunk
???
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:59 pm
by Bullseye
gcp,
I'm a little confused. Which post are you following up? Are you talking about your Vaquero?
R,
Bullseye
Taurus Judge
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:42 am
by gcp
Some how I posted a new post rather than place my response where it belonged, under the Taurus Judge subject. I apologize getlemen!
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:02 am
by Bullseye
No problem. I modified the thread title to reflect the Taurus Judge.
I have to agree, that model does not look like it was intended for target type accuracy.
R,
Bullseye
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:44 am
by jjfunk
I was very curious about the "judge" but did get a chance to shoot one about two weeks ago. For what it is it is very interesting, but definately a plinker and not a target peice. I'm sure that it could do better than I did with it, but if I was to get one it would only be for hiking/camping probably, more of a defensive pistol. Neat concept though.
JJ