XDS 45acp
Moderators: Bullseye, Moderators
- Georgezilla
- Master contributor
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:35 pm
Haka, the XDs .45 is AWESOME.
The XDs replaced the Kahr CM9 for me (economy PM9). I really didn't like design of the CM9 at all. I was not at all confident in the tiny amount of steel in the slide rails, I consider the striker block very weak compared to most other modern pistols, the mags didn't drop free, I feel like the disconnector design is a questionable. It's worth noting that I'm not a gunsmith and there are NO prevalent problems with any of the above things, just my opinions. Also, it's silly that Kahr made such a small pistol and put such a giant slide release on it. In general, I just wasn't confident in the CM9 design (or PM9).
On the contrary, the XDs .45 is solid, the design is excellent in my opinion. The trigger is of the type I like, very crisp, short reset (I consider the trigger better than most Glocks I've shot). it throws the mags out with authority. The stock sights are awesome (fiber front, double dot back). Everything I didn't like on the CM9, the XDs excels. Solid rails, solid striker block, solid disconnector design.
I only wish it was a .40S&W. They are suppose to be making a .40S&W XDs at some point.
The XDs replaced the Kahr CM9 for me (economy PM9). I really didn't like design of the CM9 at all. I was not at all confident in the tiny amount of steel in the slide rails, I consider the striker block very weak compared to most other modern pistols, the mags didn't drop free, I feel like the disconnector design is a questionable. It's worth noting that I'm not a gunsmith and there are NO prevalent problems with any of the above things, just my opinions. Also, it's silly that Kahr made such a small pistol and put such a giant slide release on it. In general, I just wasn't confident in the CM9 design (or PM9).
On the contrary, the XDs .45 is solid, the design is excellent in my opinion. The trigger is of the type I like, very crisp, short reset (I consider the trigger better than most Glocks I've shot). it throws the mags out with authority. The stock sights are awesome (fiber front, double dot back). Everything I didn't like on the CM9, the XDs excels. Solid rails, solid striker block, solid disconnector design.
I only wish it was a .40S&W. They are suppose to be making a .40S&W XDs at some point.
- bigfatdave
- Master contributor
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:22 am
- Location: near Camp Perry
Good gun, my wife wanted one and I like shooting it also. She even ran it in a pin shoot and was competitive in the scoring.
Sort of snappy
Really tight inside
Needs a very "enthusiastic" hand to rack in the first round, otherwise no issues at all with various 45acp loads I've run - if you try to chamber the first round casually, it will nosedive about half the time, you have to grip it & rip it, there's no room in the design for half-assed operation
Comes with a semi-useful paddle holster and the usual cheap mag carrier, and a comically oversize case
Nice sights
Very aggressive grip, you may want a light glove for extensive shooting
Sort of snappy
Really tight inside
Needs a very "enthusiastic" hand to rack in the first round, otherwise no issues at all with various 45acp loads I've run - if you try to chamber the first round casually, it will nosedive about half the time, you have to grip it & rip it, there's no room in the design for half-assed operation
Comes with a semi-useful paddle holster and the usual cheap mag carrier, and a comically oversize case
Nice sights
Very aggressive grip, you may want a light glove for extensive shooting
Good reports from you guys, sounds like a great carry gun, in 45acp no less.Needs a very "enthusiastic" hand to rack in the first round, otherwise no issues at all with various 45acp loads I've run - if you try to chamber the first round casually, it will nosedive about half the time, you have to grip it & rip it, there's no room in the design for half-assed operation
That appears to be and issue with many pocket semi autos, they are built with
such tight tolerances that you have to be a little aggressive with them, especially
when racking the first round in.
Thanks,
haka
I think I'd want an SD gun a bit looser. I've fired a few XD's and they have been pretty good. A .40 might be about as good as a .45 and carry a few more rounds.Hakaman wrote:Good reports from you guys, sounds like a great carry gun, in 45acp no less.Needs a very "enthusiastic" hand to rack in the first round, otherwise no issues at all with various 45acp loads I've run - if you try to chamber the first round casually, it will nosedive about half the time, you have to grip it & rip it, there's no room in the design for half-assed operation
That appears to be and issue with many pocket semi autos, they are built with
such tight tolerances that you have to be a little aggressive with them, especially
when racking the first round in.
Thanks,
haka
- Georgezilla
- Master contributor
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:35 pm
- bigfatdave
- Master contributor
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:22 am
- Location: near Camp Perry
The holster says it fits .45, .40, and 9mm - so the fo-tay might be coming along. I don't think the gun is "too tight for defense", it runs perfectly when operated by ammunition, and just requires cranking in that first round with some conviction - which you do in a relaxed setting, barring combat reloads. I carry reloads, but they're as much for reloading after the panic or from behind solid cover as they are for some kind of combat run&gun. And the XD(S) is simply not designed to be anything but a concealed carry gun, it isn't really a combat pistol for the tactical operator to wade into the fray with.greener wrote:I think I'd want an SD gun a bit looser. I've fired a few XD's and they have been pretty good. A .40 might be about as good as a .45 and carry a few more rounds.
I would say that the XD(S) is NOT a gun to wade into combat with, it is a gun to get the hell out of combat with, think "shoot&scoot" or "get off me gun"
- bearandoldman
- Ye Loquacious Olde Pharte
- Posts: 4194
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:30 am
- Location: Mid Michigan
The lighter the slide the heavier the spring. My P3AT KelTec .380 is a bear too rack the slideHakaman wrote:My PM9 is wound tighter then a drum. I have a hard time racking the slideI think I'd want an SD gun a bit looser.
open. I think the smaller the gun is the tight she's wound.
You have great day and shoot straight and may the Good Lord smile on you.


-
- Advanced contributor
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:03 pm
- Location: Downeast Maine
- Contact:
- charlesb
- Master contributor
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:39 pm
- Location: Mountains of West Texas
I've heard of one-handed shooters having a lug welded onto the side of the slide of an auto pistol, so that one can rack the slide one-handed. - The lug is placed upon the edge a solid object, like your Aunt Fazzy's antique Chippendale sideboard table for example, then just press down on the grip against the lug - and the slide comes right on back!
This might be a good add-on for hard-to-rack autos.
Lug is shaped like a .45 auto round sawed down the middle, lengthways, but is solid steel. It is usually welded on an inch or two back from the front of the slide. The rounded end goes toward the grip, the flat end is toward the muzzle.
The flat end could be checkered to give better purchase, but then you might end up marring the surface on Fazzy's priceless Chippendale!
This might be a good add-on for hard-to-rack autos.
Lug is shaped like a .45 auto round sawed down the middle, lengthways, but is solid steel. It is usually welded on an inch or two back from the front of the slide. The rounded end goes toward the grip, the flat end is toward the muzzle.
The flat end could be checkered to give better purchase, but then you might end up marring the surface on Fazzy's priceless Chippendale!