Henry Lever
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:23 pm
Just picked up a new Henry Lever in .22Mag.
Paid a whisker over $400 for it, and I'm...well, "satisfied" I guess would be accurate. The action is smooth, and a little preliminary test firing (5 rounds each of 4 different brands/types of ammo) indicates that the accuracy will be acceptable. Excellent quality wood in the stock and forearm, tho I can't say I'm too fond of the finish. Nicely done, but flat where I'd have preferred gloss.
Maybe I'm a little out of touch with prices, but for $400 there are a couple of other things about the gun I'd have expected to be better than they are.
One is the receiver. It's aluminum, and I suspect it may even be cast aluminum, judging by the orange-peel finish on it. Doesn't seem to affect the performance, just strikes me as a little cheesy for a $400 gun.
The best thing I can say about the sights is "clunky" The front blade tilts to the right and looks like a 2x4 edge-on, the rear elevator has to be in the next to top position to put rounds in the black at 50 yards.
Finally, the trigger is gritty. Let-off is crisp, and the weight is quite good actually, but the feel during takeup is definitely gritty.
I'll be keeping it, but it'll definitely be wearing some better sights. I'm flipping back and forth between a nice set of peeps or a red dot.
So, I guess my question is am I completely out of touch in the expectations vs. price department or did I pay too much for the gun?
Paid a whisker over $400 for it, and I'm...well, "satisfied" I guess would be accurate. The action is smooth, and a little preliminary test firing (5 rounds each of 4 different brands/types of ammo) indicates that the accuracy will be acceptable. Excellent quality wood in the stock and forearm, tho I can't say I'm too fond of the finish. Nicely done, but flat where I'd have preferred gloss.
Maybe I'm a little out of touch with prices, but for $400 there are a couple of other things about the gun I'd have expected to be better than they are.
One is the receiver. It's aluminum, and I suspect it may even be cast aluminum, judging by the orange-peel finish on it. Doesn't seem to affect the performance, just strikes me as a little cheesy for a $400 gun.
The best thing I can say about the sights is "clunky" The front blade tilts to the right and looks like a 2x4 edge-on, the rear elevator has to be in the next to top position to put rounds in the black at 50 yards.
Finally, the trigger is gritty. Let-off is crisp, and the weight is quite good actually, but the feel during takeup is definitely gritty.
I'll be keeping it, but it'll definitely be wearing some better sights. I'm flipping back and forth between a nice set of peeps or a red dot.
So, I guess my question is am I completely out of touch in the expectations vs. price department or did I pay too much for the gun?