new MKIII seats only with force

Discuss .22 pistols.

Moderators: Bullseye, Moderators

radio
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm

new MKIII seats only with force

Post by radio » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:48 pm

I bought a new MKIII mag at Bass Pro Shops (60 miles away) and found it would not seat with the bolt forward without a "heel of the hand slam". It is much more difficult to seat when loaded than when empty. Loaded or empty it seats up easily (with a positive "click") with the bolt open.

The 2 original "red label" mags have been perfect at all times. The new mag has a "black" label stamped on the bottom block. Are there any known issues pertaining to the "black label" mags? Should I suck it up or contact Ruger?

User avatar
blue68f100
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1997
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Piney Woods of East Texas

Post by blue68f100 » Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:12 pm

Not that I'm aware of. Check to see if you have about 1/16" up and down play in the mag when seated. Also see if you have 1/16" clearance between the mag and ejector. I have one mag that was setting too high. I had to file the notch so it would sit lower, did not take much to make it work.
David

SS MKIII 6 7/8" Fluted Hunter. Mueller Quick Shot, Bushnell 2x Scope, Hogue Rubber Grips
Custom Built 1911

User avatar
Bullseye
Site Admin/Host
Site Admin/Host
Posts: 6382
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: USA

Post by Bullseye » Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:19 pm

Does the bolt close properly with no magazine installed?

R,
Bullseye
Image

radio
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm

Post by radio » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:56 pm

Bullseye wrote:Does the bolt close properly with no magazine installed?

R,
Bullseye
Yes--no problems with anything about the gun until I tried the new mag this afternoon. With the bolt back, that mag seated just fine. I loaded and fired 10 shots--the bolt held back properly after the last round. Its all good--just very tough to seat with the bolt closed.


I will check the play and clearance asap.

thanks

radio
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm

Post by radio » Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:30 am

blue68f100 wrote:Not that I'm aware of. Check to see if you have about 1/16" up and down play in the mag when seated. Also see if you have 1/16" clearance between the mag and ejector. I have one mag that was setting too high. I had to file the notch so it would sit lower, did not take much to make it work.
The 2 original mags that work great have very little play. I would say less than 1/16". The new mag in question has even less--basically very tight.

Is the measurement from the ejector taken from the top outside lip or from the follower (in an empty mag)?

thanks again

User avatar
ruger22
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1574
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:35 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by ruger22 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:52 am

One of my six mags is what you call "black label". I have had no problem, or detect any difference in its function. Seems to be just a cost saving change, from the nice hawk emblem to a simple impression of it. The rest of the mag base, and the whole mag, looks identical.
* 2 Ruger Bearcat stainless, w/ EWK ejector housings & Wolff springs
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols

User avatar
blue68f100
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1997
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Piney Woods of East Texas

Post by blue68f100 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:49 pm

Is the measurement from the ejector taken from the top outside lip or from the follower (in an empty mag)?
It's from the outside lip of the mag. Bullseye has a photo some where showing this measurement. If I find it I will post a link to it.

I would not hurt to open the play up to match you other mags. That will make it seat easier and open the clearance on the ejector too.

I had one mag out of too that had problems. It only took a couple of strokes with a file diamond file on the mag notch to get mine to seat properly. I just made it match the one that worked. Once done not another problem.
David

SS MKIII 6 7/8" Fluted Hunter. Mueller Quick Shot, Bushnell 2x Scope, Hogue Rubber Grips
Custom Built 1911

User avatar
Bullseye
Site Admin/Host
Site Admin/Host
Posts: 6382
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: USA

Post by Bullseye » Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:44 pm

Last edited by Bullseye on Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

radio
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm

Post by radio » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:14 pm

There is no play whatsoever in the new mag and it is closer (almost in contact) to the ejector than the 2 that work fine. Exactly where should I lightly diamond file to increase the gap?

thank you

User avatar
blue68f100
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1997
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Piney Woods of East Texas

Post by blue68f100 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:20 pm

You file on the mag catch/bump. Just keep it square and flat. Just go slow and check fit as you go..
David

SS MKIII 6 7/8" Fluted Hunter. Mueller Quick Shot, Bushnell 2x Scope, Hogue Rubber Grips
Custom Built 1911

quickslider
New member
New member
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:39 pm
Location: ohio

Post by quickslider » Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:14 pm

I thought the Red mags were for Mark 3 only and black mags were for Mark 1 and 2.

perazzi
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 360
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:49 pm
Location: Hell, Michigan!

Post by perazzi » Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:31 pm

No, I've also got black bird mags from Midway that are for the Mk III. They work fine. The ones that came with the Mk III are red bird mags.
Image

User avatar
bigfatdave
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:22 am
Location: near Camp Perry

Post by bigfatdave » Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:00 pm

quickslider wrote:I thought the Red mags were for Mark 3 only and black mags were for Mark 1 and 2.
Nope, they're shipping mags now with all-black bases.
I have one from Midway and it is otherwise no different than the previous 7 mkIII mags I've owned.

JLB
New member
New member
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:34 pm

Post by JLB » Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:41 am

This may be a premature question.

I have a new Mark lll and was looking at the extractor pin, in relationship to the magazine lips. The pin is touching the lips on both magazines. I have not had a chance to get to the range yet. It is unfired at this time.

Both magazines seat the same, bolt open or closed. When they "click" in there is no movement up/down.

Guess I need to get to the range and see what happens.

Jim
Ruger Mark lll, Competition, MatchDot. Remember, you can't fix STUPID, but you can vote it out...

radio
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm

Post by radio » Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:23 pm

JLB,

The 2 original mags that work great have only the slightest amount of space between the lip and the extractor. Never even a hiccup with those. The mag that apparently needs a slight "modification" appears to be touching. It is tight with no play when inserted. It inserts fine with the bolt open, but takes a firm slap to load with the bolt closed--especially when loaded. It did, however, feed without a problem.

Let us know how your's works. You may not need to modify at all.

Post Reply