Earmuff quality
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:26 pm
Just got two sets of the Leightning LOF muffs, and have ordered some of the "hygiene kits" that replace the ear cushions and cup foam. I did a lot of research before I settled on the LOFs.
I am amazed at all the flimsy frames, headbands, and cushions on many of the muffs on the market. Even the ever-popular Peltors seem cheapo to me. Howard Leights have a stitched nylon cover over a steel headband, and reasonably heavy replaceable ear cushions. The LOF model is low profile and folds, too. All pluses.
My second runner-up was the Pro-Ears Ultra 26, because of the listed leather headband and ear cushions. But, all other parts are plastic, they don't fold, and are nearly twice the price of the Leights. The earpad kit costs as much as a whole Leightning muff.
Just my rant of the day. I have 25 year old Radio Shack Nova headphones. Mostly stainless steel with all leather headband and ear cushions. They look nearly new, work perfect, and I gave Goodwill $2 for them. And nobody now can even make a set of shooting muffs to match their quality.
I am amazed at all the flimsy frames, headbands, and cushions on many of the muffs on the market. Even the ever-popular Peltors seem cheapo to me. Howard Leights have a stitched nylon cover over a steel headband, and reasonably heavy replaceable ear cushions. The LOF model is low profile and folds, too. All pluses.
My second runner-up was the Pro-Ears Ultra 26, because of the listed leather headband and ear cushions. But, all other parts are plastic, they don't fold, and are nearly twice the price of the Leights. The earpad kit costs as much as a whole Leightning muff.
Just my rant of the day. I have 25 year old Radio Shack Nova headphones. Mostly stainless steel with all leather headband and ear cushions. They look nearly new, work perfect, and I gave Goodwill $2 for them. And nobody now can even make a set of shooting muffs to match their quality.