when did i become an "expert" contributor?

bigfatdave · Post by **bigfatdave** » Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:43 am

Someone should change that title ... I'm just winging it over here

I wouldn't want someone to get the wrong idea, I assume the forum software assigns titles based on post count, but with ~550 I'm still hardly an "expert"

greener · Post by **greener** » Tue Aug 21, 2012 7:16 am

I'm sure it's based on a careful evaluation of your contributions. That's why I'm not so listed.

congrats

Post by **Bullseye** » Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:29 am

The forum ranks are based on your post count. In Greener's case, his is unique and was created by a special request - from an older gentleman with a dog. BFD, I would say that your forum postings have been very good over the years and your level of modesty may be showing a little bit.

R,
Bullseye

bearandoldman · Post by **bearandoldman** » Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:05 am

Greener's title fits him exactly as does mine.

Post by **Bullseye** » Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:15 am

bearandoldman wrote:Greener's title fits him exactly as does mine.

I hope so, it took me quite a while to create that moniker for him.

R,
Bullseye

ruger22 · Post by **ruger22** » Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:38 am

I'm just a "Master Contributor", which is fine, much better than what the Occaisionally Better Half often calls me. I don't feel I've contributed much, but I hope a few posts have been helpful to someone. Just grateful that you guys make everyone feel welcome. Thanks!