Follow-up on the Taurus Judge

gcp · Post by **gcp** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:43 pm

Please understand guys, I intend no ill will against this gun because for what it was designed it can sure enough serve its purpose. I am just a stickler for accuracy and this gun can not provide it. I was hoping it would prove more accurate but deep inside I knew better all along. After all a wise man must never argue with nature and physics

jjfunk · Post by **jjfunk** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:44 pm

Post by **Bullseye** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:59 pm

gcp,

I'm a little confused. Which post are you following up? Are you talking about your Vaquero?

R,
Bullseye

gcp · Post by **gcp** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:42 am

Some how I posted a new post rather than place my response where it belonged, under the Taurus Judge subject. I apologize getlemen!

Post by **Bullseye** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:02 am

No problem. I modified the thread title to reflect the Taurus Judge.

I have to agree, that model does not look like it was intended for target type accuracy.

R,
Bullseye

jjfunk · Post by **jjfunk** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:44 am

I was very curious about the "judge" but did get a chance to shoot one about two weeks ago. For what it is it is very interesting, but definately a plinker and not a target peice. I'm sure that it could do better than I did with it, but if I was to get one it would only be for hiking/camping probably, more of a defensive pistol. Neat concept though.

JJ