Revolver/Auto
Moderators: Bullseye, Moderators
Revolver/Auto
Ok, here's a question for the handgunners:
If you had choice to own "just" revolvers, or "just" semi-autos, which type would you own?
Keep in mind, you could own multiple calibers and styles of one or the other,
but just in revolver or just semi auto. I am interested in knowing the reasons why as well.
Thanks, Haka
ps...I'll save my 2 cents for now.
If you had choice to own "just" revolvers, or "just" semi-autos, which type would you own?
Keep in mind, you could own multiple calibers and styles of one or the other,
but just in revolver or just semi auto. I am interested in knowing the reasons why as well.
Thanks, Haka
ps...I'll save my 2 cents for now.
- bigfatdave
- Master contributor
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:22 am
- Location: near Camp Perry
-
- Advanced contributor
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:22 pm
- Location: West Central MO
You'd have to switch to the M1917 if you wanted to remain pure.perazzi wrote:I'd keep the revolvers.....well, maybe one 1911 also.. would that be cheating?
http://www.olive-drab.com/od_other_fire ... m1917.php3
My choice would be revolvers. Simpler, easier to handle, very dependable, wider range of bullet/load available and I just happen to really like 4" revolvers.
Of course I could get by very nicely with .22 semiautomatics and 1911's.
-
- Advanced contributor
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:03 pm
- Location: Downeast Maine
- Contact:
- blue68f100
- Master contributor
- Posts: 1997
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:31 pm
- Location: Piney Woods of East Texas
I used to be a wheelgun fan, but now it would be semi-autos. They have the advantage of being, on average, easier to repair; just swap parts in many instances with little or no fitting. They are easier to detail strip. they hold more rounds, and are quicker to reload.
Revolvers have an advantage in shooting most any brand ammo that fits, and many will shoot several different calibers. But they are harder to disassemble, repair, and clean.
Revolvers have an advantage in shooting most any brand ammo that fits, and many will shoot several different calibers. But they are harder to disassemble, repair, and clean.
* 2 Ruger Bearcat stainless, w/ EWK ejector housings & Wolff springs
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols
Well, since I started this thread, I'll add my 2 cents. If I had to choose, it would be difficult, but I'm liking my revolvers better these days. They have a cool look to them, very reliable, accurate, and compete in the area of "concealed carry". They are made very light weight/strong these days, and headspace off the rim, not the mouth of the brass. Is trimming to length "less" important for headspacing? I think so. Roll crimping is another option/preference to be considered, that is more sensitive in semi autos. My 357 S&W shoots "powderpuff" 38sp loads, heavy 38sp+ loads, and 357 magnum loads. In any of those loads I don't have to worry about "cycling", it's a revovler! Sure, it only loads 5 to 8 rounds at a time, but in reality, when will you really need more for SD? As I am becoming an older reloader, I don't want to bend over and chase brass around during sessions, "brass chasing" isn't an issue, just open the cylinder/gate and plop, right into my brass container.
Ain't she a beauty !!!
Ain't she a beauty !!!
Hak,
I like all those things from revolvers. heck, I carrry one (smith 442 38spl)just about everyday and have for about 9 years. But they do have their limitations. Autos are usually flatter (for easier carry), carry more boolits, and reload faster. revolvers have the advantage if you get a click instead of a BOOM (you just pull the trigger again, instead of tap-rack-bang) and they are just the most reliable arm you can get. for my situation for a primary gun to carry on my hip I'll go with a semi-auto. thats just me though
I like all those things from revolvers. heck, I carrry one (smith 442 38spl)just about everyday and have for about 9 years. But they do have their limitations. Autos are usually flatter (for easier carry), carry more boolits, and reload faster. revolvers have the advantage if you get a click instead of a BOOM (you just pull the trigger again, instead of tap-rack-bang) and they are just the most reliable arm you can get. for my situation for a primary gun to carry on my hip I'll go with a semi-auto. thats just me though
For your line of work, I would agree 100%. I am not a "gung ho" carry person, just a weekend target shooter, along with mild competitions. That's what makes the responses interesting, everybody has their own "angle" on the subject.for my situation for a primary gun to carry on my hip I'll go with a semi-auto. thats just me though
Thanks,
Haka
Other than 2 autos in .22 caliber, I've slowly gotten rid of every automatic pistol--the last S&W 3913 9mm just the other day. I have even given away (or traded for more .38) all of the ammo for those guns.
I can fully understand all of the reasons why folks would choose automatics. Personally, I've just rolled back to the revolvers and will (very slowly) try to build up a little stockpile of ammunition for the ones that I own.
If I were in law enforcement or other field that required carry--of course I would be an AUTO man.
Good thread, and I too like reading the reasoning of fellow gun toters--most folks make a lot more sense than I do.
I can fully understand all of the reasons why folks would choose automatics. Personally, I've just rolled back to the revolvers and will (very slowly) try to build up a little stockpile of ammunition for the ones that I own.
If I were in law enforcement or other field that required carry--of course I would be an AUTO man.
Good thread, and I too like reading the reasoning of fellow gun toters--most folks make a lot more sense than I do.