New .22 SP-101 officially announced

Discuss .22 pistols.

Moderators: Bullseye, Moderators

User avatar
blue68f100
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1997
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Piney Woods of East Texas

Post by blue68f100 » Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:44 pm

My guess would be the owners were asking for one. Owner with the big brother sometimes want something to shoot that is the same weight and balance. 22 ammo is <$0.05 as avg where 357 is what $0.25 if your shooting reloads less if shooting lead.
David

SS MKIII 6 7/8" Fluted Hunter. Mueller Quick Shot, Bushnell 2x Scope, Hogue Rubber Grips
Custom Built 1911

greener

Post by greener » Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:40 pm

tom234 wrote:I'm curious why Ruger came out with this .22 LR model. For center fire models [I have the .357 mag] the SP101 is great; however, with the Ruger MKIII and 22/45 line with 11 round vs 8 capacity I see no reason for it. Any ideas ?
Ruger has nothing that competes with the S&W and Taurus .22 DA revolvers. Resurrecting the SP101 .22 gets them back in the market. I suspect they will be very competitive with the 317 and M94. Nice kit gun.

greener

Post by greener » Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:04 pm

Saw just one at the Richmond Gun Show today. Good looking revolver. Dealer wanted $559 for the .22 and $430 for the .357 version. More than I felt like spending today.

User avatar
bgreenea3
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1587
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Location: SW Michigan

Post by bgreenea3 » Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:12 pm

the 22 price should come down... after the newness wears off.


the 357 price seems ok
"Courage is being scared to death... and saddling up anyway."

-John Wayne

User avatar
ruger22
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1574
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:35 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by ruger22 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:07 am

It looks an awful lot like one of these.....

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/ ... rrorView_Y

The 63 will use traditional grips, and likely has a better trigger. A little more pricey, though.

At least the original .22 SP looked original. I wish Ruger would have copied their own gun instead of someone else's. I would have liked the reissue to be more of a .22 LR Speed-Six.
* 2 Ruger Bearcat stainless, w/ EWK ejector housings & Wolff springs
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols

User avatar
bgreenea3
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1587
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Location: SW Michigan

Post by bgreenea3 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:48 pm

old ruger

Image


Image
new ruger


Image
smith


at least ruger put the excellent adjustable sight from the gp100/redhawk on this one. for a msrp of $100 less the ruger looks pretty good...
"Courage is being scared to death... and saddling up anyway."

-John Wayne

jimjc
New member
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:34 pm

Post by jimjc » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:39 am

Is it just me but a Ruger 22 that sells for what their 357 sells for just seems like Ruger is starting to take advantage of the move to the 22lr that many are making. Does anyone know if the 22 is built on the same standard as the 357 because if it isn`t then Ruger has overpriced this gun, unless street price is close to $425, anyone think this is where the 22 will sell at.

Don`t get me wrong I like the SP101, I really like my GP 100 but the gp can be had for about $500 and the sp for less than $450

Post Reply